Nudi Notes

Table of Sea Slug Feeding Preferences

Mar 4, 2022

A generalized table indicating the diet of the major sea slug groups.

Click the image below to view the full table (opens in a Google Sheet in a separate tab)

About the table
The above is just an image for navigation purposes and will not show the latest revisions/corrections. Use the link to access the most recent version. Zoom or resize to suit your screen. (Google account not required)

The table is simplified to:
– The better-known sea slug groups
– The major food preferences

The coloured key serves to provide a visual approximation of the proportion of that sea slug group preying upon that particular food source. They are an estimate as an aid to find general trends and not based upon meticulous calculation.

Be aware that there are always exceptions and obscure examples but the table can act as a guide for those sea slugs that are more commonly encountered. There is still a lot to learn and record concerning sea slug diets.

In interpreting the table and drawing conclusions therefrom, care should be taken to be aware of how the sea slug groups are comprised and how the diet sources may in some instances be categorized into smaller recognizable units. Also, remember that it is the groupings that are represented not species. Species usually have most specific dietary requirements – even within a diet group.

What does the Feeding Preferences Table indicate to us?
(Generalizations on a generalized table)

Prey popularity across groups
The first overall observation, in looking at the number of diet headings, supports the contention that the sea slugs, as a whole, possess a diverse diet, encompassing almost every marine invertebrate taxon and much of the marine plant life as well.

The second observation, in looking down the columns, would be noting that some prey are represented across several groups, for example, those sea slugs that prey upon sponges and those that prey upon algae are abundantly populated. Conversely, other prey remain the target of just a single group, for example, the cnidarians (possession of stinging cells) are almost solely preyed upon by the cladobranch nudibranchs – the aeolids, arminids and dendronotids.

Prey popularity within groups
The rows of coloured squares tell us that two of the sea slug groups in particular utilize a great diversity of food types while a number of other groups have food preferences that are limited to a single type.

– The headshield slugs (Cephalaspidea) and the phanerobranch nudibranchs exhibit the greatest diversity of diet across their groups.

– The side-gilled slugs (Pleurobranchoidea) have a somewhat broad diet across the group but this is influenced by the generalist nature of the diet of some members.

– The aeolid and dendronotid nudibranchs have a diet mostly restricted to cnidarians although filling many squares in the table. This is an artefact of the table through the way the cnidarians have been represented by their component sub-divisions, giving an impression of higher diversity at first glance.

– The cryptobranch and porostome nudibranchs – sponge diet, the Sacoglossa and the sea hares (Anaspidea) – algae and relatives diet, all have a diet that is restricted to a single type of food source.

– The fact that two sources are utilised in the arminid nudibranchs – bryozoans and octocorals may be an indicator of the unnatural grouping of its members.

– We would expect that groups with a relatively small membership would tend to show a narrow diet and the umbrella-shelled slugs (Umbraculoidea) are a good example of this.

– The blue coloured squares bring to our attention that a small number of species in larger groups have broken out to become specialised feeders on different dietary sources to that consumed by the greater number of their brethren.

The link between diet and morphology
In most instances the penetration of a sea slug group into a certain habitat is based upon the food source available to them in that habitat. The evolution of their digestive and defensive systems and their body form has been predicated by their diet. More on this to follow.

David A. Mullins – March 2022

References:
– Thompson, T. E. (1960). Defensive Adaptations in Opisthobranchs. Journal of Marine Biological Association U.K. 39: 123-134

– Rudman, W. B. (1970). A revision of the genus Philine in New Zealand with descriptions of two new species (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia 2(1): 23-34.

– Thompson, T. E. & Bennett, I. (1970). Observations on Australian Glaucidae (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 49, 187–197, pls. 1–2.

– Rudman, W. B. (1972). The anatomy of the opisthobranch genus Hydatina and the functioning of the mantle cavity and alimentary canal. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 51: 121-139.

– Rudman, W. B. (1979). The ecology and anatomy of a new species of aeoiid opisthobranch mollusc; a predator of the scleractinian coral Porites. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 65: 339-350.

– Rudman, W. B. (1981a). Further studies on the anatomy and ecology of opisthobranch molluscs feeding on the scleractinian coral Porites. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 71: 373-412.

– Rudman, W. B. (1981b).The anatomy and biology of alcyonarian-feeding aeolid opisthobranch molluscs and their development of a symbiosis with zooxanthellae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72: 219-262.

– Rudman, W. B. (1982). The taxonomy and biology of further aeolidacean and arminacean nudibranch molluscs with symbiotic zooxanthellae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 74: 147-196.

– Willan, R. C. (1984). A review of diets in the Notaspidea (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia), Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia, 6(3-4): 125-142.

– Rudman, W. (1987). The genus Trapania (Nudibranchia: Goniodorididae) in the Indo-West Pacific. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 53, 189–212.

– Gosliner, T. M. (1987) Review of the nudibranch genus Melibe with description of two new species. The Veliger, 29: 400-414.

– Vitalis, T. Z., Spence, M. J. & Carefoot, T. H. (1988) The Possible Role of Gut Bacteria in Nutrition and Growth of the Sea Hare Aplysia. The Veliger 30 (4): 333-341.

– McDonald, G. & Nybakken, J. (1991). A preliminary report on a world-wide review of the food of nudibranchs. Journal of Molluscan Studies. 57, 61-63

– Cattaneo-Vietti, B., Burlando, B. & Senes, l. (1993) Life history and diet of Pleurobranchaea meckelii (Opisthobranchia: Notaspidea). Journal of Molluscan Studies. 59, 309-313.

– Jensen, K. R. (1997). Evolution of the Sacoglossa (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia) and the ecological associations with their food plants. Evolutionary Ecology 11: 301–335.

– McDonald, G. (1997). List of the worldwide food Habits of Nudibranchs. Available online at: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2220.8247

– Rudman, W. B. & Willan, R. C. (1998). Opisthobranchia Introduction. Pp. 915-942 in Beesley, P. L., Ross, G. J. B.and Wells, A. (eds.), Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. 5, Part B. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

– Burn, R., Thompson, T. E.  (1998). Order Cephalaspidea. Pages 943–959 in P.L. Beesley, G.J.B. Ross, and A. Wells, eds., Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. 5, Part B. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

– Burn, R.   (1998). Order Sacoglossa. Pages 961–974 in P.L. Beesley, G.J.B. Ross, and A. Wells, eds., Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. 5, Part B. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

– Willan, R. C.  (1998). Order Anaspidea. Pages 974–977 in P.L. Beesley, G.J.B. Ross, and A. Wells, eds., Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. 5, Part B. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

– Rudman, W. B. (1998-2010). Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. Available from: http://www.seaslugforum.net

– Miller, M. D., Webmaster (1998-2022) The Slug Site. Available from: https://slugsite.tierranet.com

– Gosliner, T. M. (2001). Aposematic coloration and mimicry in opisthobranch mollusks: new phylogenetic and experimental data. Bollettino Malacologico, Roma. 37 (5-8): 163-170.

– Gosliner, T. M. & Valdes, A. (2002). Sponging off of Porifera: New Species of Cryptic Dorid Nudibranchs (Mollusca, Nudibranchia) from the Tropical Indo-Pacific. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 51-61.

– Ritson-Williams, R., Shjegstad, S. & Paul, V. (2003). Host specificity of four corallivorous Phestilla nudibranchs (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). Marine Ecology Progress Series Vol. 255: 207-218.

– Gosliner, T. M. & Smith, V. G. (2003). Systematic review and phylogenetic analysis of the nudibranch genus Melibe (Opisthobranchia: Dendronotacea) with descriptions of three new species.  Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 54: 302-355.

– Frick, K. (2003). Response in nematocyst uptake by the nudibranch Flabellina verrucosa to the presence of various predators in the Southern Gulf of Maine. Biological Bulletin, 205: 367–376.

– Greenwood, P. G., Garry, K., Hunter, A. & Jennings, M. (2004). Adaptable defense: a nudibranch mucus inhibits nematocyst discharge and changes with prey type. Biological Bulletin, 206: 113.

– Behrens, D. W. (2005). Nudibranch Behaviour. New World Publications, Florida, USA

– Burghardt, I. & Gosliner, T. M. (2006) Phyllodesmium rudmani (Mollusca: Nudibranchia: Aeolidoidea), a new solar powered species from the Indo-West Pacific with data on its symbiosis with zooxanthellae. Zootaxa 1308: 31-47.

– Burghardt, I., Schrodl, M. & Wagele, H. (2008). Three new solar powered species of the genus Phyllodesmium Ehrenberg, 1831 (Mollusca: Nudibranchia: Aeolidoidea) from the tropical Indopacific with analysis of their photosynthetic activity and notes on biology. Journal of Molluscan Studies 74: 277–292.

– Gosliner, T. M. & Fahey, S. J. (2008). Systematics of Trapania (Mollusca: Nudibranchia: Goniodorididae) with descriptions of 16 new species. Systematics and Biodiversity 6 (1): 53–98.

– Coleman, N. (2008). Nudibranchs Encyclopedia. Neville Coleman’s Underwater Geographic Pty Ltd, Springwood, Qld. p. 134.

– Greenwood, P. G. (2009). Acquisition and use of nematocysts by cnidarian predators. Toxicon.54:1065–70.

– Gosliner. T.M. and Fahey, S.J. (2011). Previously undocumented diversity and abundance of cryptic species: a phylogenetic analysis of Indo-Pacific Arminidae Rafinesque, 1814 (Mollusca: Nudibranchia) with descriptions of 20 new species of Dermatobranchus. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 161, 245–356.

– Nakano, R. & Hirose, E. (2011). Field Experiments on the Feeding of the Nudibranch Gymnodoris spp. (Nudibranchia: Doridina: Gymnodorididae) in Japan. The Veliger 51(2):66-75.

– da Cruz, J. F., Gaspar, H. & Calado, G. (2012). Turning the game around: toxicity in a nudibranch-sponge predator–prey association. Chemoecology 22: 47-53.

– Churchill C. K. C., Valdés Á. & Ó Foighil, D. (2014). Molecular and morphological systematics of neustonic nudibranchs (Mollusca : Gastropoda : Glaucidae : Glaucus), with descriptions of three new cryptic species. Invertebrate Systematics, 28, 174–195.

– Moore, E. J., & Gosliner, T. M. (2014). Additions to the Genus Phyllodesmium, with a Phylogenetic Analysis and its Implications to the Evolution of Symbiosis. The Veliger 51(4): 237–251.

– Burn, R. (2015). Nudibranchs and related molluscs. Museum Victoria.

– Shipman, C. & Gosliner, T. (2015). Molecular and morphological systematics of Doto Oken, 1851 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia), with descriptions of five new species and a new genus. Zootaxa 3973:57-101.

– Goodheart, J. A. & Bely, A. E. (2016). Sequestration of nematocysts by divergent cnidarian predators: mechanism, function, and evolution. Invertebrate Biology 136(1): 75–91.

– Zamora-Silva, A. & Malaquias, A. E. (2016). Diet preferences of the Aglajidae: a family of cephalaspidean gastropod predators on tropical and temperate shores. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 96(5), 1101–1112.

– Goodheart, J. A., Bazinet, A. L., Valdés, Á., Collins, A. G., & Cummings, M. P. (2017). Prey preference follows phylogeny: evolutionary dietary patterns within the marine gastropod group Cladobranchia (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia). BMC Evolutionary Biology. 17(1).

– Nimbs, M. J., Willan, R. C. & Smith, S. D. A. (2017). A Historical Summary of the Distribution and Diet of Australian Sea Hares (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Aplysiidae). Zoological Studies 56: 35.

– Nakano, R. (2017). Natural feeding habits of two nudibranchs: Kalinga ornata and Plocamopherus tilesii (Nudibranchia: Doridacea: Polyceridae). Molluscan Research, 37:2, 153-157.

– Willan R. C. & Chang Y. -W. [Yen-Wei]. (2017). Description of three new species of Tambja (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia, Polyceridae) from the western Pacific Ocean reveals morphological characters with taxonomic and phylogenetic significance for traditional Polyceridae and related ‘phaneorobranch’ nudibranchs. Basteria. 81(1-3): 1-23.

– Gosliner, T. M., Valde ́s, A ́. & Behrens, D. W. (2018). Nudibranch & Sea Slug Identification – Indo-Pacific, 2nd Edition. New World Publications, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

– Filho, H. G., Paulay, G. & Krug, P. J. (2019). Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic. Zootaxa Vol. 4614, No. 3 pp. 541-565.

– Fritts-Penniman, A. L., Gosliner, T. M., Ngurah Mahardika, G. & Barber, P. H. (2020) Cryptic ecological and geographic diversification in coral-associated nudibranchs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 144:106698.

– Mehrotra, R., Arnold, S., Wang, A. et al. (2020). A new species of coral-feeding nudibranch (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Gulf of Thailand. Marine Biodiversity 50, 36.

– Ponder, W. F. & Lindberg, D. R., with illustrations by Ponder, J. M., (2020). Biology and Evolution of the Mollusca, Volume One & Two. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.